Search for: "Coloplast A/S"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2021, 3:58 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Nicholas Caddick QC) Coloplast A/S v Salts Healthcare [2021] EWHC 107 (Pat) (26 Jan 2021)I discussed Nicholas Caddick QC's decision in Coloplast A/S v Salts Healthcare Limited [2021] EWHC 3 (Pat) (18 Jan 2021) in Patents - Coloplast A/S v Salts Healthcare Limited. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:30 am
The patent in suit was EP (UK) 2 854 723 for a comfort layer for a collecting bag and the claimant, Coloplast A/S, was the patentee. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:42 am
According to confidential sources and a news report in Bloomberg, Coloplast A/S, has agreed to pay about $16 million to settle its transvaginal mesh lawsuits. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:49 am
Coloplast argues that the West Virginia forum is preferable to Georgia since there is little overlap or common issues of fact between its products and Mentor’s ObTape. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
In today’s case of the day, Coloplast A/S v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:36 am
Coloplast A/S claimed they were co-inventors of the invention and therefore co-owners of it. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The dispute in Coloplast v Salts related to Coloplast's patent EP(UK) 2854723, and the alleged infringement of the patent by Salts, another ostomy product company. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:49 am
More from our authors: Competing for the Internet: ICANN Gate – An Analysis and Plea for Judicial Review Through Arbitration by Flip Petillion & Jan Janssen€ 205 The post Coloplast A/S obtains preliminary injunction against MBH-International A/S and its Danish distributor OneMed A/S appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:49 am
More from our authors: Competing for the Internet: ICANN Gate – An Analysis and Plea for Judicial Review Through Arbitration by Flip Petillion & Jan Janssen€ 205 The post Coloplast A/S obtains preliminary injunction against MBH-International A/S and its Danish distributor OneMed A/S appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 10:22 pm
Coloplast held that Hollister had not previously considered the wet-laid concept to be Hollister’s own invention. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:17 am
Coloplast’s lawyers requested a separate MDL be established just for Coloplast pelvic mesh. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
One of the more popular devices is the Novasilk mesh, manufactured by Coloplast. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm
Bard, Avaulta, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon, and Coloplast. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:48 am
DOJ’s application of its False Claims Act disclosure and cooperation policy remains murky at best, leaving in question whether government contractors and others can rest assured that they will receive real “credit” under the policy when its disclosure, cooperation and remediation requirements are met. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:52 am
The FDA order immediately prohibits the sale of Boston Scientific’s Uphold Lite and Xenform mesh products, as well as Coloplast’s Restorelle DirectFix. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Coloplast, No. 19-4385(E.D. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
It appears to be a one-off complaint filed in Pennsylvania state court and, since Coloplast is a Minnesota company, removed to federal court where Coloplast’s preemption motion might be better received. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:22 am
Coloplast is also at the lead of pushing the settlement ball forward. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:06 pm
Bard, Avaulta, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon, and Coloplast. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:01 am
Bard, and Coloplast for sums that exceed the previous settlements with American Medical Systems, (AMS). [read post]